5 thoughts on “Navy Working Uniform Video”

  1. Few thoughts after watching that video;
    – You should be ashamed of yourself CMC! Cover on crooked and cocked towards the back with a gaudy fold crease in the middle, where was your buddy check?
    – When did the navy start wearing mutiple warfare devices in the primary position? To preempt here, NAVADMIN 271/09 paragraph 1.B. does NOT authorize this and neither does NAVPERS 15665I Chapter 5 section 1 or 2. I have seen quite a few of these clowns walking around. Great example Chief!

  2. Agree. Although the wording could stand a little smoothing out.

    As far as the multiple warfares above the US NAVY strip – That would be great if someone can actually find a reference authorizing this. I have always stood by the addage that “if it’s not in the regs, it is not authorized.”

    ETCS(SS/SW/EXW)

  3. NAVADMIN 343/08 states:

    Paragraph 7.J.(2) …ENLISTED PERSONNEL AUTHORIZED TO WEAR TWO WARFARE/QUALIFICATION INSIGNIA AND AN IDENTIFICATION BADGE (ON WORKING UNIFORMS AS NOTED IN PARA 7.K BELOW) MAY WEAR THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WARFARE/QUALIFICATION INSIGNIA CENTERED AND FLUSH ABOVE THE “U.S. NAVY” FABRIC STRIP. THE NWU IS THE ONLY UNIFORM IN WHICH TWO WARFARE INSIGNIAS MAY BE WORN IN THIS MANNER.

  4. I have been educated…

    NAVADMIN 343/08 par 7.J.(2):

    ENLISTED PERSONNEL
    AUTHORIZED TO WEAR TWO WARFARE/QUALIFICATION INSIGNIA AND AN
    IDENTIFICATION BADGE (ON WORKING UNIFORMS AS NOTED IN PARA 7.K BELOW)
    MAY WEAR THE PRIMARY AND SECONDARY WARFARE/QUALIFICATION INSIGNIA
    CENTERED AND FLUSH ABOVE THE “U.S. NAVY” FABRIC STRIP. THE NWU IS THE
    ONLY UNIFORM IN WHICH TWO WARFARE INSIGNIAS MAY BE WORN IN THIS MANNER.

  5. Whoops, it’s in the regs. Probably shouldn’t go spouting off the way things used to be when you were in the Navy before you do some fact checking.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *